For a long time now, I've been collecting and analyzing my games. All analysis is aided by a computer and I am most certainly a hopeless patzer. Some of these games are interesting, some are terrible, but all of them are mine and they live on this site so I can perhaps learn from them.
If you play through my games on the embedded boards, my commentary should be integrated in all recent games. Unless noted, all games are correspondence games.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Mark L 2002 vs. LindseyAnn 0-1
[Event "www.ChessWorld.net server game"]
[Site "www.ChessWorld.net "]
[Date "2007.11.27"]
[Round "NA"]
[White "Mark L 2002"]
[Black "lindseyann"]
[TimeControl "-"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C44"]
[WhiteELO "1462"]
[BlackELO "1394"]
{Termination "White king mated" Mode "ICS" DateLastMove "2007.12.15" Board "4349499"}
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 d5 4.Bb5 dxe4 5.Bxc6+ bxc6 6.Nxe5 Qg5 7.Nxc6
{This was his first major error. It allowed me to ruin his kingside.}
7...Qxg2 8.Rf1 e3
{I wanted to threaten his knight, but Ba6 would have won the rook. He didn't move his knight so I ended up winning it.}
9.dxe3 Qxc6 10.b3 Bd6 11.h4 Nf6
{Once again, putting the bishop on a6 would have been a better choice.}
12.Ba3 Bxa3 13.b4 Bb2 14.Nd2 Bxa1
{It would have been better to hold back on winning the exchange, keeping the potential threat of Qxc3 avalible.}
15.Qxa1 O-O 16.Nb3 Be6 17.Nd4 Qc4 18.Ne2 Qxh4 19.a4 Bc4 20.Qb2 Qh5 21.Rg1 Rad8 22.Qc2 Rd6
{Ng4 was a move the computer wanted me to play forever. I preferred not to commit my knight just yet.}
23.Ng3 Qf3 24.a5 Rfd8 25.Nf5 Rd1+ 26.Qxd1 Qxd1#
{This game was very one sided. I could have made a few better choices but overall I took advantage of the tactics on the board.}
0-1
Labels:
Analyzed,
Chessworld,
Playable Game,
Win
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment