For a long time now, I've been collecting and analyzing my games. All analysis is aided by a computer and I am most certainly a hopeless patzer. Some of these games are interesting, some are terrible, but all of them are mine and they live on this site so I can perhaps learn from them.
If you play through my games on the embedded boards, my commentary should be integrated in all recent games. Unless noted, all games are correspondence games.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Voula vs. LindseyAnn 1-0
[Event "Online Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2009.10.30"]
[Round "1"]
[White "voula"]
[Black "lindseyann"]
[TimeControl "1"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO " "]
[WhiteELO "1278"]
[BlackELO "1412"]
{Termination "voula won by resignation"}
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nxc6 dxc6
{bxc6 was in the opening book.}
6.Bg5 Be7
{I should have played Qxd1+ Kxd1 Nxe4. Then he can castle and I'm up a pawn.}
7.Qxd8+ Bxd8 8.Nc3 O-O 9.O-O-O Re8 10.e5 Nd7
{Nd5 probably would have been a better move. My pieces are suffocating.}
11.Bxd8 Rxd8 12.Bc4 b5 13.Bd3 Nxe5
{I missed the easiest tactic in the world, lost my rook and the game.}
14.Bxh7+ Kxh7 15.Rxd8 Nc4 16.f4 Bd7
{Hangs the bishop and the rook. I have no idea how this could happen.}
17.Rxd7 Nd6 18.Rxc7 a5 19.Rxc6 Rc8 20.Rxd6 b4 21.Ne4
{This was a terrible game. I have no idea what I was thinking for any of
this.}
*
Labels:
Analyzed,
Chess.com,
Loss,
Playable Game
The Buttle vs. LindseyAnn 1-0
[Event "Online Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2009.10.30"]
[Round "1"]
[White "The_Buttle"]
[Black "lindseyann"]
[TimeControl "1"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO " "]
[WhiteELO "1528"]
[BlackELO "1596"]
{Termination "The_Buttle won by checkmate"}
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 b5 5.Bb3 Nf6 6.O-O Bc5 7.c3 Nxe4 8.d4 exd4 9.cxd4 Bb6 10.Re1 d5 11.Nc3 Bf5 12.Nxd5
{We both played inaccurately here. The threat of Bxd5 was a very dangerous one. He could have gone up a piece because of the pin on my c6 knight after Bxd5. Instead he played Nxd5 and things remained even.}
12...O-O 13.Nxb6
{0-0 was the 'right' move for me. But I'd rather not had the doubled pawns.}
13...cxb6 14.Bf4 Re8 15.Bg5 Qd7 16.d5 Ne7
{This move really weakened my position. It would have been best to play Na5. He should have played d6 immediately, but he plays it fast enough to ruin my day.}
17.Ne5 Qb7 18.d6 Rad8
{And this was the beginning of my downfall. I should have realized that his bishop on g5 was hanging. Nxg5 dxe7 Rxe7 and I'm still in the game. It's pretty much over from here.}
19.Bxf7+ Kf8 20.dxe7+ Qxe7 21.Bxe7+ Rxe7 22.Qxd8+ Re8 23.Qxe8#
1-0
Labels:
Analyzed,
Chess.com,
Loss,
Playable Game
Friday, November 6, 2009
LindseyAnn vs. tc_gingernut 1-0
[Event "www.ChessWorld.net server game"]
[Site "www.ChessWorld.net "]
[Date "2009.10.30"]
[Round "NA"]
[White "lindseyann"]
[Black "tc_gingernut"]
[TimeControl "-"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO " "]
[WhiteELO "1090"]
[BlackELO "1320"]
{Termination "Black king mated" Mode "ICS" DateLastMove "2009.11.7" Board "6390229"}
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nc3 e6 4.Nf3 Bb4 5.Bd2 Nf6 6.e3 b6 7.Bxc4
{Missed a very obvious tactic here. Qa4+ and I win the bishop. He can't defend with the knight cause then I just take and fork the king and rook.}
7...a5 8.O-O Bxc3 9.Bxc3 Nc6 10.Rc1 Ba6 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 h5 13.Rfd1 Ng4 14.Qb5
{The computer says reversing the move order was more accurate. d5, then Qb5.}
14...Qd6
{And since he didn't defend correctly, my move order was more devastating.}
15.d5 Ke7
{Another really bad move.}
16.dxc6 Qc5 17.Bf6+
{I'm really glad I found this tactic, rather than just taking the g-pawn.}
17...Kxf6 18.Rxc5 bxc5 19.Qxc5 Rad8
{I missed the mate in one from here, but I see it soon.}
20.Rxd8 Rxd8 21.Qg5#
{Black king mated}
1-0
*
Labels:
Analyzed,
Chessworld,
Playable Game,
Win
LindseyAnn vs. TheSnarler 1-0
[Event "www.ChessWorld.net server game"]
[Site "www.ChessWorld.net "]
[Date "2009.10.25"]
[Round "NA"]
[White "lindseyann"]
[Black "thesnarler"]
[TimeControl "-"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO " "]
[WhiteELO "1067"]
[BlackELO "1217"]
{Termination "Black king mated" Mode "ICS" DateLastMove "2009.11.6" Board "6376737"}
1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 Bxc3+ 4.bxc3 Nf6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 g5 7.Bg3 Ne4 8.Qc2
{I did not consider the fact that I didn't need to protect the pawn, and I could have further developed with e3 instead. Nxc3 leads to Qc2 and the knight is trapped.}
8...f5 9.Nf3 Nxg3 10.hxg3
{This is a nice example of a game where I didn't need a castled king to win. He however make some bad mistakes down the road.}
10...Nc6 11.e3 O-O 12.Bd3 b6
{He should have played Qf6 here. Instead I get to bust open his kingside, where all my peices are pointing.}
13.Rxh6 Rf6 14.Rh2
{The computer likes Rh5 better.}
14...a5
{A very silly move considering his situation is getting dire.}
15.Nxg5 Rg6 16.f4
{I missed a great tactic here. 16. Rh8+ Kxh8 17. Nf7+ and the queen and king are forked.}
16...Qf6 17.Kd2 Bb7
{He should have used the extra time to play Rh6 and put a stop to my attack.}
18.Rah1 Ne7 19.Qd1
{Eyeing the H5 square.}
19...c5 20.Qh5
{I missed my chance to blow things up here. Rh8+, and he has to take back with the queen and I win all his pieces and the game is over. The game is still pretty much over.}
20...cxd4
{This move was terrible. His only chance was Rxg5 saccing the exchange but getting rid of my nasty knight. I miss the move that starts mate in 4, but he's still done for.}
21.cxd4
{Mate in 4: 21. Qh8+ Qxh8 22. Rxh8+ Kg7 23. R1h7+ Kf6 24. Rf7#}
21...e5
{And he steps into a really awesome mate that I miss.}
22.dxe5
{Mate in 4: 22. Qh8+ Qxh8 23. Rxh8+ Kg7 24. R1h7+ Kf6 25. dxe5#}
22...Qc6
{Thankfully I did not miss mate in one.}
23.Qh8#
{Black king mated}
1-0
Labels:
Analyzed,
Chessworld,
Playable Game,
Win
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Meterobz vs. LindseyAnn 1-0
[Event "Online Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2009.10.30"]
[Round "1"]
[White "meteorbz"]
[Black "lindseyann"]
[TimeControl "1"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO " "]
[WhiteELO "1718"]
[BlackELO "1169"]
{Termination "meteorbz won by resignation"}
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4
{Scotch. Boo.}
3...exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nxc6 bxc6 6.e5 Qe7 7.Qe2 Nd5 8.Bd2
{Finally out of the opening book. 8. c4, further harassing my knight would have been in the opening book.}
8...Qe6 9.Nc3 Rb8 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.Bc3 Bc5
{Bb4 is a bit better.}
12.Qc4 Qxc4 13.Bxc4
{Things are still pretty even. If I was a good player I probably could have pulled out a draw.}
13...O-O 14.O-O d5 15.exd6ep cxd6 16.Rab1 Bf5 17.Bb3 Rfe8 18.Rfe1 d5 19.Bd2 Re6 20.Rxe6 Bxe6 21.Re1 Re8 22.Kf1 Bd6 23.Ba4 Bxh2
{While the computer does not reguard this move as terrible, I do. I should not have allowed my central pawn structure to break down and isolated my d-pawn.}
24.Bxc6 Bc7
{Did I really just hang my rook?}
25.Bxd5
{And did he really not take it?}
25...Kf8 26.Bxe6
{Simplifying with me down a pawn and major queen side weakness.}
26...Rxe6
{My choices were to either take with the pawn, and have more bad pawn, or go along with his plan of simplification. I was pretty much done at this point.}
27.Rxe6
{And I definitely didn't realize when I choose to simplify that I'd end up with the bad pawns no matter what.}
27...fxe6 28.Ke2 Kf7 29.Be3 a6 30.Kd3 Kf6 31.Ke4
{Ties my king down to the protection of the kingside pawns, while he gets the pawns rolling on the queenside.}
31...g5 32.c4 h5 33.b4 g4 34.a4 *
This was my first completed game after a longish chess break. It was played at a new site, Chess.com and I was playing a member of the UCF Chess club.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)